Jim McMahon responds to the Transport Secretary’s speech on the Government’s review of Britain’s railways
***Check against delivery***
Jim McMahon MP, Labour’s Shadow Transport Secretary, responding to the Transport Secretary’s speech on the Government’s review of Britain’s railways, said:
“It is two and half years since the Williams Review was first commissioned. And the very fact that Williams was commissioned at all shows that the state, the travelling public and those excluded from the railways because of accessibility, have been given a poor deal.
“And whilst much has changed on the network over that time due to Covid, what he’s announced today is pretty much what was briefed out and reported in the Telegraph in November of last year. So, can I firstly ask the Secretary of State when he settled on this position? And if it was back in November, why he didn’t announce it then?
“It is said that control of both the infrastructure and the contracting of train operations, will be given to the arms-length government owned body, with private firms bidding to run concessions, with an agreed profit margin built in. Can he confirm whether a publicly owned provider will be able to bid for these concessions? Can he also confirm if an Operator of Last Resort will continue to exist, and if so, will it be brought fully back in house?
“It’s been reported that the Treasury is demanding cost cuts of between 10% and 20%. Can he confirm this is the case? There is concern that rather than increased investment, the real driver behind bringing track and trains under one group is at its heart a move to disguise painful cuts? Any talk of cuts in funding like the £1 billion funding cut Network Rail which we have already seen, will have a direct impact on jobs, our regions and vital maintenance and upgrade works.
“Does the Secretary of State know how many jobs will be lost by a 10 or 20% reduction in funding, and what assessment has he made of the impact in each of our regions?
“The head of Network Rail, Andrew Haines, and its chairman, Sir Peter Hendy, are to be tasked with drawing up the processes and structures of the new Great British Railways. What date will they report by?
“And Mr Speaker can I ask him about freight. Can he say more about how the reforms will impact the Track Access regime, and the governance arrangements for freight if Network Rail takes charge of the passenger railway, albeit under a different name?
“Decarbonising transport will mean a much greater shift is needed from road to rail. How will the reforms help rail freight grow as part of decarbonising freight transport, and what targets will he set in this respect?
“Mr Speaker, the Government has also made an announcement on flexible ticketing; though few details have been provided. A lack of detail on any flexible ticket promise, and whether it will make travel cheaper for the average commuter renders it meaningless for millions of passengers, and completely fails to meet the scale of challenge required to encourage people back onto the rail network as we come through the pandemic. What research has the Government done to see if type of product will address the needs of the travelling public?
“Mr Speaker this report fundamentally fails to tackle one of biggest issues with our public transport system that timetables for modes of transport just don’t join up. We need a bus and train system that genuinely connects people rather than leaves them standing around in the cold waiting for connecting services.
Will the Secretary of State work towards joining up different modes of transport, and what devolved powers does he envisage for our Metro Mayors and transport authorities as part of his plan?
“And on devolution. Will the Government finally follow through on transferring train station responsibilities to our Metro Mayors, as expected in Greater Manchester some years ago?
“We haven’t seen any detail on what profit margin operators can expect, and whether the cost of this will hit fares or investment. Will he publish this?
“Finally Mr Speaker while I welcome steps to increase public control and ownership over the railways. It doesn’t go far enough, I believe that there is ample proof that fuller public ownership rather than the concessionary model would be better.
“I fear the Government have not fully understood the scale of the challenge in front of them, and in doing we may see the change of name on the side, but fundamentally passengers will still left short changed.”